COVID-19 ANNOUNCEMENTS AND RESOURCES


SEARCH
X

Start Searching

San Francisco Association of REALTORS® San Francisco Association of REALTORS® San Francisco Association of REALTORS®
  • About
    • OUR ASSOCIATION
    • STAFF DIRECTORY
    • BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    • SFAR Committees & Councils
    • DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION
    • AFFILIATES
  • JOIN TODAY
    • BECOME A MEMBER
    • WHY JOIN SFAR
    • REALTOR® BENEFITS
    • SFAR MLS BENEFITS
    • AFFILIATE BENEFITS
  • Events
  • News
    • NEWS RELEASES
    • PRESS RELEASES
  • Resources
    • SFAR Support Center
    • Member Services Request Forms
    • MLS FORMS AND SFAR INFORMATION
    • Videos
    • SFAR Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Foundation
  • Join Now
  • Login

News

Details
Wednesday October 30, 2013

This Year at the California State Capitol

With the State legislature adjourning on September 12, this year’s legislative cycle in the State Capitol has come to a close. Below is a quick summary and update of the legislative bills that the California Association of REALTORS® supported and opposed in 2013.

AB 1229 (Toni Atkins) – Inclusionary Zoning

What It Would have Done: AB 1229 would have allowed local governments to force newly constructed housing developments to provide new rent controlled units at the site of the development, significantly expanding the stock of rent controlled units in California.

REALTOR® Impact: AB 1229 effectively reverses the state-wide rent control limitations that were established in the landmark “Costa-Hawkins” law sponsored by C.A.R. in 1995. Additionally, by forcing new housing developments to include below-market-rate units in their financing structure, AB 1229 would have significantly slowed the development of new housing across the state.

C.A.R. Position: Oppose.

What Happened: AB 1229 narrowly passed the Assembly and State Senate houses with heavy grassroots opposition from REALTORS®. Governor Brown vetoed AB 1229 on October 13, 2013 thereby killing the bill.

SB 30 (Ian Calderon) - Debt Forgiveness Income Tax

What It Does: SB 30 would have provided tax relief to property owners who are selling their homes in a short sale. It would have brought California into alignment with the federal government’s Mortgage Debt Reduction Act of 2007, which forgave borrowers from income tax liability on debt forgiven in a short sale.

REALTOR® Impact: SB 30 would have guaranteed that homeowners, particularly ones with underwater mortgages, could short sell their homes without fear that they would face income tax liability from the debt forgiven in a short sale. It would have allowed distressed homeowners to regain financial stability without being penalized by the government.

C.A.R. Position: Support, Sponsored.

What Happened: In the Senate Appropriations Committee, SB 30 was “linked” to another bill, SB 391, which meant that SB 30 could not become law without SB 391 also passing. C.A.R. strongly opposed linking the two measures, and worked through the year to unlink the bills. SB 30 became a “two year” bill, and can be passed and signed into law as late as April 14, 2014.

sfar-footer-logo

 

Site Map

Membership
Events
News
Documents
 

Help

Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
DMCA Notice
Accessibility
Email Us

Company

About
Careers
Press Releases
Foundation
Contact

Contact

301 Grove Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 431 8500

© 2019. Designed & Developed by Lifted Solutions